Turn your district's current expanded-learning attendance process into one consistent, reviewable reporting workflow, from provider participation to validated CALPADS LEAP-oriented output.
Request a Demonstration See How It WorksDistrict ELO-P teams often coordinate attendance across internal programs, outside providers, site teams, and systems that were never designed to speak the same language.
Providers and sites may track attendance in different tools, formats, naming patterns, and routines.
Names, IDs, grade levels, and program records need to be matched carefully against district data.
Unmatched, ambiguous, or duplicate records need human review instead of disappearing into a black box.
Attendance totals need to be filterable, reviewable, and prepared for the district's reporting process.
The system is built around each district's providers, attendance routines, matching rules, reporting fields, and review process, converting hundreds of minutes into seconds for the recurring review work teams repeat every reporting cycle.
We configure around how your district, sites, and providers already collect and manage attendance.
Different attendance inputs are aligned into one consistent district attendance structure.
Provider records are matched against district student records, with unresolved students flagged for review.
Staff can review unmatched or ambiguous students without restarting the entire process.
Reports can be filtered by academic year, vendor, date range, ELO-P status, grade range, and more.
Validated records support a CALPADS LEAP-oriented reporting workflow.
These simplified views show the workflow areas districts usually care about most. Full demos are tailored around your current attendance process, providers, systems, and reporting requirements.
| Input | Records | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Spring Provider A | 1,284 | Processed |
| After School Partner | 822 | Needs Review |
| Summer Program | 2,041 | Processed |
Review provider participation, record totals, processing status, and items still requiring attention.
| Student | Issue | Action |
|---|---|---|
| J. Martinez | Possible duplicate | Review |
| A. Nguyen | Missing ID | Match |
| S. Patel | Name variation | Resolve |
Unmatched students stay visible so staff can resolve records before export.
| Filter | Selection |
|---|---|
| Academic Year | 2026-2027 |
| Vendor | All providers |
| ELO-P Status | Eligible students |
Review totals by year, vendor, date range, grade range, and district-specific filters.
| Export Step | Result |
|---|---|
| Required fields | Checked |
| Unresolved matches | 0 remaining |
| Reporting workflow | Ready |
Prepare reviewed attendance data for the district's LEAP reporting workflow.
When a provider or site needs a simple daily attendance method, the ELO-P Attendance Manager now includes an attendance taker built into the same workflow. Staff can record participation at the point of service, and districts can still review, match, validate, and prepare the LEAP reporting output in one place.
The annual service agreement includes a district-specific configured environment, authorized staff logins, implementation, customization, maintenance, and reasonable support.
Provider attendance routines can be mapped into the district workflow as part of implementation.
Student matching and validation rules can reflect your district's identifiers and data conventions.
Authorized staff logins can be configured for district users who need to collect, review, approve, or report.
Each portal can be configured for the participating district's environment and process.
Report fields, filters, and review requirements can be tailored to the district's workflow.
Provider workflows and reporting needs change, so the service includes ongoing maintenance and support.
The workflow is based on real operational attendance reconciliation: provider participation is organized, records are normalized, exceptions remain visible, totals are reviewed, and reporting data is prepared after validation. The goal is not to pretend every match is automatic. The goal is to make the whole process clearer, faster, and more reviewable.
Yes. That is the point of the implementation process. We configure the solution around your providers, systems, attendance routines, fields, and matching needs.
That is common. The workflow can accommodate different provider methods and align them to the district's review and reporting process.
Unmatched or ambiguous students are flagged for review so staff can resolve exceptions without restarting the whole workflow.
No. It supports attendance reconciliation and a CALPADS LEAP-oriented export workflow. It does not replace district systems of record.
Yes. Filters, fields, validation checks, and export requirements can be configured around the district's process.
The cost varies by district size, number of providers, customization needs, support needs, and implementation scope. Request a demonstration and we can discuss the right fit.
PlanetBravo configures the ELO-P Attendance Manager around your providers, attendance routines, student matching needs, SIS environment, and CALPADS/LEAP reporting requirements.